2012-04-19                     Senate Journal                      Page 2416
HB 359                                                                                                                        
CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 359(FIN) am S was read the third time.                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 359(FIN)                                                                       
am S "An Act relating to conspiracy to commit human trafficking in                                                              
the first degree or sex trafficking in the first degree; relating to the                                                        
crime of distribution of indecent material to minors, the crime of                                                              
online enticement of a minor, the crime of prostitution, and the crime                                                          

2012-04-19                     Senate Journal                      Page 2417
of sex trafficking; relating to forfeiture of property used in prostitution                                                     
offenses; relating to testimony by video conference; adding Rule 38.3,                                                          
Alaska Rules of Criminal Procedure; and providing for an effective                                                              
date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result:                                                           
                                                                                                                                
CSHB 359(FIN) am S                                                                                                              
Third Reading - Final Passage                                                                                                   
Effective Date    Court Rule                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  16   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  4   ABSENT:  0                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
Yeas:  Coghill, Davis, Egan, Ellis, French, Giessel, Hoffman,                                                                   
Kookesh, McGuire, Meyer, Olson, Paskvan, Stedman, Stevens,                                                                      
Thomas, Wielechowski                                                                                                            
                                                                                                                                
Excused:  Dyson, Huggins, Menard, Wagoner                                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
and so, CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 359(FIN) am S passed the Senate.                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
Senator Meyer moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on                                                                
the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date                                                            
clause. Without objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
Senator Meyer moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on                                                                
the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court Rule                                                                
change. Without objection, it was so ordered.